Why does a virtual default destructor make a class non-trivially-destructible?
Why does a virtual default destructor make a class non-trivially-destructible?
I hope you found a solution that worked for you :)
The Content is licensed under (https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing) CC BY-SA.
Attention! This video does always use the same license as the source!
Thanks to all those great people for their contributions!
(stackoverflow.com/users/1145526/dmytro-ovdiienko)Dmytro Ovdiienko
(stackoverflow.com/users/2610810/caleth)Caleth
(stackoverflow.com/users/9837301/jamit)JaMiT
A special thanks goes out to the (stackoverflow.com/questions/79475748/why-does-a-virtual-default-destructor-make-a-class-non-trivially-destructible)Stackexchange community
I wish you all a wonderful day! Stay safe :)
If anything is off, please write me at peter D.O.T schneider A.T ois42.de
destructor language-lawyer c++