25 Nov 2021 Difficulty with language in explaining technical issues, Part 1; teaser
1725 Nov 2021. The difficulty with linguistics and language in explaining technical issues.
22:22- Softcell Tainted love
Thank you all for being here. I was recently asked about a book on Schumann Resonances. I explained was that what I would rather write a book on was the nature of language and what happened to make is such a messed-up experience.
As part of my experience in the 3 years I've dedicated to exclusively explaining the SR (along with associated atmospheric electromagnetics); I've come to understand the variety of reasons why people come here, and the other SR-related group and Youtube channel I manage.
Some folks are here for "ascension"; some for the reason that they just want to learn about the Earth/planet/natural systems. Some are here because they feel there's a natural, magical quality to 7.8Hz; they want to uncover the secrets behind the magic.
It's been discussed here, and elsewhere, the role of belief in research on SR/associated atmospheric electro-magnetics. There's a high degree of belief behind the motivation for many (the majority ?) coming here to learn. Belief is not the problem. Using science, or a scientific graph to support the belief is the core of the problem.
Do as you want. Believe as you choose. With humans, NOTHING is automatic. It's all by choice.
I'm not here to dissuade any beliefs. Nor is anyone here looking to topple any belief systems, nor religions.
This group was not started as a place where we are discussing the spiritual/religious value of the spectrogram as "The Schumann."
As a technician, I have over 40 years in "the field" of audio, video, electronics, computer repair, radio/television broadcasting, working live concerts as a sound guy, working on digital capture systems, and on the list goes... even if it's just volunteering at the local public tv studio to assist in the studio as an extra cameraman.
I've spent alot of time in the field working, in addition to technical and vocational training in the theory behind all that stuff, so I know the 'entirety' of how the computer mainframe and servers work, and how the network "as a whole" functions, in addition to having to slave through learning javascript (which no one should ever have to, unless you're working on it, but whtvr).
As a tradesman, there's a certain work ethic, an attitude, collaborative spirit that comes from working with a crew of guys, all geared towards a singleness of purpose. The tradesmen have a language, and a manner of conveying information that's paired to the work itself, along with the tools necessary to do the job. We have similar training.
Accordingly, we can help elevate, and educate our peers on the uniqueness of each job as it comes along; because some of us understand the theory a little more comprehensively than our peers. Yet, there's physical aspects to the job that some guys are just better at.
In the lab environment, there is a certain protocol, training and conditioning necessary to fully understand the situation of the laboratory.
In some settings, people can, and have gotten hurt in electrical/ atomic experiments gone awry. Safety is a huge concern in alot of these settings. Safety comes through awareness. Mindfullness in noticing small differences in the material sometimes. Knowing when the material is about to transform catastrophically is an important part of safety. Noticing when a seemingly inconsequential source of heat is next to a combustible compound, is important to safety.
Mindfullness, and attention to detail are two import elements to onsite safety, so that we all get to go home at the end of the day.
What's this have to do with Schumann resonances?
The protocol to keep the data intact, like a safety switch.
The problem is that the Schumann resonances are invisible. There's lots of job hazards that are invisible. One first task is to make visible the invisible.
This is the job of the spectrogram.
There's a huge section of this discussion that is no longer secured through an actual experience; yet it is unsecured, invisible. Much of the belief system that folks arrive here with is actually a detriment to their clear, safe understanding of what the atmospheric phenomena is.
I use the word "safe" to make a sideways nod to those folks who are prone to spastic behaviour over the spikes on the spectrogram.
Words themselves can be the invisible hazard; due to the logical concepts held by a person in the head.
_
Schumann-resonances sharable link: ( https://schumannresonances.wixsite.com/website/post/25-nov-2021-the-difficulty-with-linguistics-and-language-in-explaining-technical-issues )
Wordpress shareable link: ( https://vertearbustosschumannresonanceharmonics.wordpress.com/2021/11/25/25-nov-2021-the-difficulty-with-linguistics-and-language-in-explaining-technical-issues/ )
Patreon: ( https://www.patreon.com/posts/59139066 )