31 May 2021 Introduction: How To Read The Schumann Resonance Spectrogram Properly.
3830 May 2021. How To Read The Schumann Resonance Spectrogram Properly.
Mainly narration of written material
Content starts @ 2:09
Spectrogram is not "The Schumann" @ 6:16
Introducing The Spectrogram @ 21:51
Earth's Geoelectric Power Grid @ 31:13
Introducing The Antenna @ 36:52
Orientation of the Spectrogram @ 48:48
Twelve Dependencies (4 Modes of Reception) @ 1:10:31
Modes provide the coloring information @ 1:17:42
Transliterating color info on the spectro @ 1:20:50
- Keywords: Amplitude, Quality, deci-Bel, Mode, Dependency;
ionosphere,
__
schumann-resonances shareable link: (https://www.schumann-resonances.com/post/30-may-2021-how-to-read-the-schumann-resonance-spectrograph-properly)
_
The purpose of this essay is to assist people who are interested in understanding the Schumann Resonances, as atmospheric phenomena from the technical perspective.
Additional to the atmospherics, we are faced with the detecting hardware of the antennae complex; attached to the meters, graphs used to detect then record these signals, eventually plotted on the Spectrogram.
The Schumann resonances (SR) are a set of spectrum peaks in the extremely low frequency (ELF) portion of the Earth's electromagnetic field spectrum. Schumann Resonances are extremely subtle; which means specialize detecting equipment is necessary, in addition to putting the detector antenna in a remote location. Complex chain of processing is necessary to secure a valid signal. There are multiple "moving parts" in this equation.
Often times, these subtle atmospheric electromagnetics are over-powered by em fields of unshielded domestic electronics.
We are looking to explore the SR. However, it's now a common occurrence to confuse SR with any and all atmospheric electromagnetics.
We discuss what are the SR, in addition to what they may not also be.
_
The Tomsk Spectrogram is NOT "The Schumann"
- What is "The Schumann"?
Although this phrase is commonly-used in the "Earth's rising vibrations" belief system ("Ascensionism"), there is no such thing as "The Schumann." This phrase is not found in Webster's dictionary. Nor is it found in Oxford's Encyclopedia of the English Language. This is not a phrase found in any scientific literature. There simply exists no standard, technical, scientific definition of the phrase "The Schumann."
Yet, with the human condition, language underwrites all thoughts of the human. A definition is necessary to continue. There is a degree of fuckery inherent in the language, that allows for a wiggle factor, to conceal the innate meaning of a thought-form that is not well-developed; or a thought-form that is not grounded in one's actual reality. In other words, the language allows for a built-in distortion, or concealment of truth, behind personal perceptions.
Part of "The Schumann" problem is one's innate understanding of a concept, or phrase as a definite thought-form in the head: what clear picture does a person have in their head?
Part of "The Schumann" problem rests in the inability of the vocabulary itself not being able to convey the proper meaning. SR is radio, and invisible to the unaided eye; as such, a visual aid is necessary.
Part of "The Schumann" problem is the fact that the word inherently is meaningless technically-speaking. It is one thing which has been misappropriated to represent something else, completely different. Due to the inherent fuckery of the phrase being introduced AS a means of confusion, continued use of the phrase is a continued walk along a pathway of confusion.
Belief itself has a power. Belief is fueled by the rhetoric we choose. How well do we know our own viewpoint, or the tenets of our belief? What is the degree of "hocus pocus" in the words that your belief uses?
Inherently, there is no scientific, technical, actual meaning behind the phrase "The Schumann." Among other reasons, a primary problem is that it is uncertain what are the parameters phrase covers. It's simply your inferred understanding of the phrase 'The Schumann', that allows it to have signifigance. Yet...
what does "The Schumann" actually mean?
Phrase "The Schumann" is at this point, what amounts to religious ideology associated with the Religion of Schumannism, or the Cult of Ascensionism, perhaps. That there is no standard definition behind "The Schumann" is what allows wonky ideology to be corrupted.
Essentially, the difference between 'The Schumann' and the spectrogram is the inclusion of supporting data; and how the visual representation gets transliterated (whether it is read, or interpreted.) It's my understanding the "The Schumann" gets channelled or interperated based not on the actual accepted science.