A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - For Honor Beta
25As the release of For Honor - the medieval action fighting game by Ubisoft - is just around the corner, we were intrigued to check out how integrated graphics can handle the impressive visuals.
As you might imagine, we went for 720p resolution with Low quality preset. The performance delta is huge between the two systems - the A10 is more than 2x faster than the i3 on the Citadel Gate map and in the built-in benchmark. Will be interesting to see whether the Intel CPU can close the gap with game-ready drivers.
Intel slim-SFF build:
CASE + PSU: InWin BQ660 + 150W Internal PSU
MOTHERBOARD: Gigabyte GA-Z170N-WIFI Mini ITX LGA1151
CPU: Intel Core i3-6100 3.7GHz
GPU: integrated - Intel HD Graphics 530
RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws 8GB (2x4GB) DDR4 3000MHz
STORAGE: Samsung m.2 SATA 500GB SSD 850 EVO
COOLER: SCYTHE Kozuti
AMD slim-SFF build:
CASE + PSU: InWin BQ660 + 150W Internal PSU
MOTHERBOARD: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XN-WIFI Mini ITX FM2+
CPU: AMD A10-7860K 3.6 Ghz/4.0 GHz
GPU: integrated - AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
RAM: G.SKILL Ares 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 2400MHz
STORAGE: Samsung SSD 850 EVO 2.5" SATA III 500GB
COOLER: Noctua NH-L9a AMD CPU Cooler
A dedicated recording PC with a capture card was used to save the game footages and consequently no performance penalty was incurred on the reviewed systems. For convenience, games are installed on an external SSD and connected to the reviewed PC via USB3.1 interface.
Don't forget to like and subscribe, visit http://boostclock.com for more information / detailed charts!
Other Videos By BoostClock
Other Statistics
For Honor Statistics For BoostClock
At present, BoostClock has 9,914 views spread across 5 videos for For Honor, and less than an hour worth of For Honor videos were uploaded to his channel. This makes up 1.80% of the content that BoostClock has uploaded to YouTube.