AFMV on the left (60 FPS) vs AFMF on the right (50 FPS by doubling from 25 FPS)
Bluesky Frame Rate Converter 4.6.1 used with Adrenalin 23.12.1 version
(https://bluesky-soft.com/BlueskyFRC.html)
Also, checked AFMF preview version and Radeon pro 23.Q4 drivers work well.
Interpolation is not perfect but both behaved more or less similarly.
AFMF ONLY doubles the framerate, but it CAN be applied to ANY video.
Usually, 2x fps is enough for video playback frame interpolation.
Though I still prefer 120 FPS output using GCN card.
I couldn't compare both cards at the same time using my general madVR renderer setting due to high power consumption.
When 120 FPS out and NGU Sharp High or Very high setting used:
1080p 24 FPS youtube source takes about 120-140W
1440p 24 FPS youtube source takes about 170-210W :(
RX 6000, 7000 can decode recent codecs much better (VP9 & AV1).
Combination of RDNA and GCN cards can decode by RDNA and interpolation by GCN card.
I wonder if RX 6500 XT could handle 8K or more, then probably no madVR.
My RDNA3 card takes extra 4-6W (1080p), 20-25W (1440p) for AFMF (vs. no AFMF) but it's still lower than separate GCN card (minimum 45-70W+ and extra PCI lanes)
AFMF can be used with different renderers (DX9 to newer), probably great to use 50 or 60 FPS sources or non-regular FPS sources
5