AQC 2016 - Simulated Annealing Comparison Between All-to-All Connectivity Schemes

Subscribers:
348,000
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1-iad-nylU



Duration: 33:31
1,109 views
13


A Google TechTalk, June 29, 2016, presented by Tameem Albash (USC)
ABSTRACT: Quantum annealing aims to exploit quantum mechanics to speed up the solution to optimization problems. Most problems exhibit complete connectivity between the logical spin variables after they are mapped to the Ising spin Hamiltonian of quantum annealing. To account for hardware constraints of current and future physical quantum annealers, methods enabling the embedding of fully connected graphs of logical spins into a constant-degree graph of physical spins are therefore essential. Here, we compare the recently proposed embedding scheme for quantum annealing with all-to-all connectivity due to Lechner, Hauke and Zoller (LHZ) [Science Advances 1 (2015)] to the commonly used minor embedding (ME) scheme.

Using both simulated quantum annealing and parallel tempering simulations, we find that for a set of instances randomly chosen from a class of fully connected, random Ising problems, the ME scheme outperforms the LHZ scheme when using identical simulation parameters, despite the fault tolerance of the latter to weakly correlated spin-flip noise. This result persists even after we introduce several decoding strategies for the LHZ scheme, including a minimum-weight decoding algorithm that results in substantially improved performance over the original LHZ scheme. We explain the better performance of the ME scheme in terms of more efficient spin updates, which allows it to better tolerate the correlated spin-flip errors that arise in our model of quantum annealing. Our results leave open the question of whether the performance of the two embedding schemes can be improved using scheme-specific parameters and new error correction approaches.

Presented at the Adiabatic Quantum Computing Conference, June 26-29, 2016, at Google's Los Angeles office.




Other Videos By Google TechTalks


2016-11-21AQC 2016 - A Quantum-Assisted Algorithm for Sampling Applications in Machine Learning
2016-11-10What is in Common Between Quantum Computer and Solar System?
2016-11-10Simulating the Quantum World on a Classical Computer
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - Coupled Quantum Fluctuations and Quantum Annealing
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - Max-k-SAT, Multi-Body Frustration, & Multi-Body Sampling on a Two Local Ising System
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - Boosting Quantum Annealer Performance via Quantum Persistence
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - Avoiding Negative Sign Problem in Simulation of Quantum Annealilng
2016-10-20AQC2016 - Classical Modeling of Quantum Tunneling
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - Adiabatic Quantum Computer vs. Diffusion Monte Carlo
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - Floquet Quantum Annealing with Superconducting Circuit
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - Simulated Annealing Comparison Between All-to-All Connectivity Schemes
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - Parity Adiabatic Quantum Computing
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - Towards Quantum Supremacy with Pre-Fault-Tolerant Devices
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - Scaling Analysis & Instantons for Thermally-Assisted Tunneling and Quantum MC Simulations
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - The Quantum Spin Glass Transition on the Regular Random Graph
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - A Fully-Programmable Measurement-Feedback OPO Ising Machine with All-to-All Connectivity
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - Origin and Suppression of 1/f Magnetic Flux Noise
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - Building Quantum Annealer v2.0
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - Roadmap for Building a Quantum Computer
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - Driving Spin Systems with Noisy Control Fields: Limits to Adiabatic Protocol
2016-10-20AQC 2016 - An Optimal Stopping Approach for Benchmarking Probabilistic Optimizers



Tags:
google techtalks
quantum computing