C++ : Clang and GCC vs MSVC and ICC: Is a static_assert in the copy/move constructor required to wor

Channel:
Subscribers:
76,600
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcqLmhVLdS4



Duration: 1:32
0 views
0


C++ : Clang and GCC vs MSVC and ICC: Is a static_assert in the copy/move constructor required to work, if copy/move elision could apply too?
To Access My Live Chat Page,
On Google, Search for "hows tech developer connect"

As promised, I have a hidden feature that I want to share with you.
This is a YouTube's feature which works on Desktop.
First, Make sure the video is currently in playing mode.
Then, type the letters 'awesome' on the keyboard.
You will see a flashing rainbow instead of a regular progress bar on YouTube.

Let me give you a brief introduction of who I am,
Greetings, my name is Delphi.
Allow me to support you in answering your questions.
C++ : Clang and GCC vs MSVC and ICC: Is a static_assert in the copy/move constructor required to work, if copy/move elision could apply too?
If you have specific questions that need answers, please don't hesitate to comment or chat with me.
If you have knowledge to contribute or an answer to provide, we encourage you to comment below.
Your answer will be recognized and valued, and I will 'heart' it to show my appreciation.
the MSVC GCC constructor static_assert vs work, and ICC: Clang copy/move C++ a : could Is required copy/move if to in and too? apply elision