Why ChatGPT is Not a Threat to Academia / Theories of Truth
Channel:
Subscribers:
2,650
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVq5NUDRlFI
Today we looked at some examples of ChatGPT and talked about why it should not present the threat to academia we think it will - all essays submitted by students are archived forever, and when students know that their submissions will be scanned by AI detection software in the future, the risk is too great to use AI generated work in their submissions.
Some will undoubtedly cheat anyway, and once tools get good enough in the future to detect them reliably, this will be a great way of identifying students who think they can get away with it.
We also went over more theories of truth.
Other Videos By Bill Kerney
2023-02-10 | C++ Linked Lists (Part I) |
2023-02-10 | Ethics and Computer Science |
2023-02-08 | C++ Unordered Maps (Hashu Mappu!!!) |
2023-02-08 | Logical Implications |
2023-02-06 | Debugging Tactics for C++ |
2023-02-06 | Valid, Invalid, and Sound Arguments |
2023-02-06 | Emu War Speech |
2023-02-03 | C++ Iterators and Ranges in the Standard Library |
2023-02-03 | Learning to Program With Scratch |
2023-02-01 | Makefiles & Separate Compilation in C++ |
2023-02-01 | Why ChatGPT is Not a Threat to Academia / Theories of Truth |
2023-01-30 | Operators in C++ |
2023-01-30 | What is Truth? |
2023-01-27 | How to approach a project and the C++ Rule of Three |
2023-01-27 | Evaluating Claims / Truth Tables |
2023-01-25 | Evaluating Claims |
2023-01-25 | C++ Smart Pointers and Inheritance |
2023-01-24 | C++ Class Design: Invariants, Friends, and Operators |
2023-01-20 | C++: "Proper" Class Design |
2023-01-11 | Basic C++ in 80 minutes |
2023-01-11 | Fizzbuzz in six seconds |