Why use (void)++p rather than just ++p in this C++ standard proposal?
Why use (void)++p rather than just ++p in this C++ standard proposal? duplicate
I hope you found a solution that worked for you :)
The Content is licensed under (https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing) CC BY-SA.
Attention! This video does always use the same license as the source!
Thanks to all those great people for their contributions!
(stackoverflow.com/users/508343/xmllmx)xmllmx
(stackoverflow.com/users/17732522/user17732522)user17732522
A special thanks goes out to the (stackoverflow.com/questions/79293047/why-use-voidp-rather-than-just-p-in-this-c-standard-proposal)Stackexchange community
I wish you all a wonderful day! Stay safe :)
If anything is off, please write me at peter D.O.T schneider A.T ois42.de
c++ expression standards void