A10-7860K Frame Time Analysis - Battlefield 1 Beta DX11 vs DX12

Channel:
Subscribers:
1,480
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYLfYAfu3Tk



Battlefield 1
Game:
Duration: 2:25
11,859 views
55


DICE's Frostbite game engine is renowned for delivering advanced rendering techniques with exceptional scalability, so naturally, we were very keen to test the latest iteration of Battlefield, Battlefield 1. Unfortunately, a long-standing compatibility issue between our Skylake setup and capture card is preventing us from recording 720p Intel footage, so this time around it's an AMD APU only test. We take a horse ride around the Sinai Desert level and compare the performance of the two available APIs. Although we got excellent frame per second values on both runs, we experienced lots of stutter, occasional, but severe drops – the frame time graphs really exposes how bad it is.

Don't forget that the game is a beta release and it's DX12 codepath is not polished / ready. Moreover, AMD hasn't released an APU driver since late July. If they can significantly reduce the deal-breaker jerkiness, the game may perform well on integrated graphics.

AMD slim-SFF build:
CASE + PSU: InWin BQ660 + 150W Internal PSU
MOTHERBOARD: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XN-WIFI Mini ITX FM2+
CPU: AMD A10-7860K 3.6 Ghz/4.0 GHz
GPU: integrated - AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
RAM: G.SKILL Ares 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 2400MHz
STORAGE: Samsung SSD 850 EVO 2.5" SATA III 500GB
COOLER: Noctua NH-L9a AMD CPU Cooler

A dedicated recording PC with a capture card was used to save the game footages and consequently no performance penalty was incurred on the reviewed systems. For convenience, games are installed on an external SSD and connected to the reviewed PC via USB3.0 interface.

Don't forget to like and subscribe, visit http://boostclock.com for more information!




Other Videos By BoostClock


2016-11-01A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Battlefield 4
2016-10-27A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Battlefield 3
2016-10-20A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Star Wars Battlefront
2016-10-14A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Call of Duty: Black Ops III
2016-10-09A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - F1 2016
2016-10-03Codemasters F1 2015 vs F1 2016 Graphics Comparison @ Suzuka
2016-09-27A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Grand Theft Auto V
2016-09-23A10-7860K Frame Time Analysis - DOOM OpenGL vs Vulkan
2016-09-18A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Minecraft
2016-09-13Codemasters F1 2015 vs F1 2016 Graphics Comparison @ Marina Bay Street Circuit
2016-09-10A10-7860K Frame Time Analysis - Battlefield 1 Beta DX11 vs DX12
2016-09-03A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Hitman: Absolution & Sniper Elite III
2016-08-30Codemasters F1 2015 vs F1 2016 Graphics Comparison @ Monza
2016-08-25Codemasters F1 2015 vs F1 2016 Graphics Comparison @ Silverstone Rain
2016-08-18A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Bioshock Infinite
2016-08-11A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Aliens vs. Predator DX11 Benchmark & Alien: Isolation
2016-08-08A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Unigine Heaven & Unigine Valley
2016-08-05A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - GRID Autosport & F1 2015
2016-08-03A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - DiRT 3 Complete Edition & DiRT: Showdown
2016-08-01A10-7860K vs i3-6100 Frame Time Analysis - Tomb Raider (2013) & Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor



Tags:
amd apu
benchmark
frame time analysis
Battlefield 1
BF1
Frostbite
A10-7860K
amd radeon r7
dx11
dx12



Other Statistics

Battlefield 1 Statistics For BoostClock

At present, BoostClock has 40,898 views spread across 10 videos for Battlefield 1, and less than an hour worth of Battlefield 1 videos were uploaded to his channel. This makes up 3.59% of the content that BoostClock has uploaded to YouTube.