C++ : should I use it or static_cast void* then static_cast myType* to avoid reinterpret_cast?

Channel:
Subscribers:
76,400
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PSseOg0B5k



Duration: 1:20
0 views
0


C++ : should I use it or static_cast void* then static_cast myType* to avoid reinterpret_cast?
To Access My Live Chat Page,
On Google, Search for "hows tech developer connect"

As promised, I'm going to share a hidden feature with you.
This is a YouTube's feature which works on Desktop.
First, Ensure that the video is playing before proceeding.
Next, enter the letters 'awesome' on your keyboard.
You will see a flashing rainbow instead of a regular progress bar on YouTube.

A brief presentation of myself,
Nice to meet you, I am Delphi.
I can assist you in discovering answers to your inquiries.
C++ : should I use it or static_cast void* then static_cast myType* to avoid reinterpret_cast?
Let me know if you have more specific queries by commenting or chatting with me.
Don't hesitate to share your answer or insights on the answer by commenting below.
Your answer will be recognized and valued, and I will 'heart' it to show my appreciation.
: static_cast myType* should static_cast to use or reinterpret_cast? I C++ it avoid then void*