C++ : When a class dynamically allocates itself at constructor, why does stack overflow happen inste
C++ : When a class dynamically allocates itself at constructor, why does stack overflow happen instead of std::bad_alloc?
To Access My Live Chat Page,
On Google, Search for "hows tech developer connect"
As promised, I have a secret feature that I want to reveal to you.
This is a YouTube's feature which works on Desktop.
First, Ensure that the video is playing before proceeding.
Then, type the letters 'awesome' on the keyboard.
The progress bar on YouTube will be altered to a flashing rainbow.
A brief introduction of myself,
Hello, I am Delphi.
Let me aid you in resolving any queries you may have.
C++ : When a class dynamically allocates itself at constructor, why does stack overflow happen instead of std::bad_alloc?
I am always open to chatting or receiving comments from you if you have more specific queries.
Your input is valuable, so please comment below if you have an answer or any insights to the answer.
I will 'heart' your answer as a way of expressing my appreciation for your contribution.
a itself why overflow does instead happen When constructor, stack dynamically allocates C++ class : at of std::bad_alloc?