🎮 Pirate Software Drama Explained – Reaction to Developer Examines PirateSoftware (Part 1)
In this video, I react to Part 1 of the “Developer Examines PirateSoftware” series, where the creator investigates Pirate Software’s job history, industry claims, and the development issues surrounding Heartbound. This deep dive into the Pirate Software drama raises questions about credentials, experience, and the realities of indie game development.
Link to the original video:    • Developer Examines PirateSoftware - Part 1... Â
đź§ What I cover in this reaction:
The difference between high-level languages like Python and low-level languages like C++
Why C++ is preferred in game development for performance reasons
Why QA roles (like at Blizzard) don’t necessarily equate to programming expertise
The value of non-developer perspectives in game quality assurance
Thoughts on whether it's fair for someone with a QA background to claim they were a “pro game developer”
📌 This video is NOT about part 2 (DRM/code review) — I’m strictly discussing the first installment in this series.
If you’re curious about the Pirate Software controversy, indie dev backgrounds, or just want insight into game development roles, this reaction breaks it down in simple, honest terms.
Link to my course: hhttps://www.udemy.com/course/website-creation-with-no-coding/?referralCode=E925A59EB95AAB3E8FAALink to my store for merch and awesome gaming accessories for US customers: hhttps://gmansemporium.com/Link to my gaming blog: hhttps://gmanreviews.blog/Follow me on Twitter for updates: Â https://twitter.com/gman_reviewsFollow me on Facebook: Â https://www.facebook.com/GmanGamingandReviews