Why I Left University Research Behind FOR GOOD
4Fraudulent practices have rocked behavioral science in recent years. In this candid conversation with Amy Bucher, we unpack high-profile cases that revealed deep flaws in research practices — from falsified findings to studies that can’t be replicated.
We examine why academic incentives often push researchers toward “positive” results, how peer review can miss critical issues, & why transparency measures like pre-registration are essential but not enough.
We also share personal stories, the courage of whistleblowers who risked their careers, & how we approach research today to avoid applying junk science in our own work.
📣 LISTEN TO THE FULL AUDIO PODCAST WITH AMY BUCHER
https://www.buzzsprout.com/222312/episodes/17360197
CHAPTERS
00:00 Introduction
00:15 The Francesca Gino & Dan Ariely Scandals
04:20 The Incentive to Publish Strong Findings
06:37 The Limitations of Peer Review
07:46 Whistleblowers Pay a Price
08:47 Throwing out Undesirable Data
09:20 Citing Papers Written by the Editorial Board
KEY INSIGHTS
🎯 Academic incentives can prioritize dramatic results over truth.
🎯 Peer review is essential but imperfect.
🎯 Ethical practices, transparency, and pre-registration are key to rebuilding trust.
FOLLOW AMY BUCHER
📖 Book: https://www.amazon.com/Engaged-Designing-Behavior-Amy-Bucher/dp/193382042X
💼 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/amybucher
🏢 Company: https://lirio.com/ucher
🔔 DON’T MISS OUT
Subscribe for more conversations on behavioral science, product design, & ethical technology at the intersection of psychology and innovation.
#behavioralscience #researchintegrity #gamethinking #ethics #falsedata