Chucklefish's corruption on Wargroove forums

Channel:

Master Knight DH

Subscribers:

1,970

Published on February 25, 2019 7:47:25 PM ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7ffR5r8MHk

Game:

Wargroove (2019)

Duration: 16:39

1,016 views

0

Ace Attorney music belongs to Capcom. I'm not intending to steal anything from them, of course.

Script URL:
https://pastebin.com/iS2APqN4

Rivals AC video (points against VARIOUS Fake Difficulty issues):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoP1L8evwDc

Battalion Wars 1 Bonus Mission 3 video (points against AI Roulette, points toward competent gameplay):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asS-x4TA9Oc

Battalion Wars 2 Longplay video (points toward competent gameplay):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYIy-QGhUkI

Checkmark Games' AI tutorials:
https://web.archive.org/web/20170328132758/http://www.checkmarkgames.com/search?updated-min=2013-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2014-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=8
https://www.youtube.com/user/stacktrace/videos
(Used Wayback Machine because the blog got changed, bloody industry politics.)

So people complain about Wargroove's VARIOUS issues, and one such complaint is about RNG S-Ranks, which was already idiocy in the original Advance Wars--granted, I don't think there were TOO many levels in AW1 that had to worry about it, but Andy Times Two definitely did on NORMAL Campaign, since your ability to get an S-Rank at all--yes, an S-Rank, not even a PERFECT S-Rank--was dependent on Eagle's AI feeling like being competent. Wargroove doesn't even have the excuse of allied AI being involved and somehow it makes the AI Roulette problem even worse.

I responded within a topic by a complaint by a user named Monty Sigurdson about the AI Roulette when he stood his ground against the "git gud" nonsense and oh look, I get false-reported as "shilling" for providing supporting evidence, and then the Wargroove staff decided to arbitrarily agree with that. For starters, the false-reporter is a case of the serpent trying to look like an innocent flower, and has proven as such for the last year and a half. More condemning, however, is that when I call out the garbage, the topic gets locked with literally the only response to my last length post being a meager line saying what the topic contradicts by its very nature. This after I put, IN BOLD, that failure to try to take on my arguments would be evidence of them dodging the subject.

If you're going to claim that they closed it because I called them out for saying that I was "breaking rules", then guess what? There's such a thing as spirit of the law, and if you're going to ignore that, if you're going to have a zero-tolerance policy without consideration for validity that transcends the given rules, then your rules suck. And while I'm at it, I called out the false-reporter for active bias. Chucklefish, of course, decided to foster this bias. This is guaranteed to be the reason why the topic was just locked without even so much as moderator response.

It just amazes me. Chucklefish already did something similar for a game mod for Starbound named Frackin Universe, by enabling the mod's "developer" who refused to give proper credit for material he profited off of, threw a massive fit about a single, easily "corrected" underscore character, and then pulled some slander campaign that burned down not only reviews but other game mods that were only not "legitimate" because they weren't compatible with his game mod--and all of that, over some game mod that involved an aggravated grindfest when its name's abbreviation would make the Bottle Ship in Metroid: Other M look competent. Oh, and that farce happened in June 2017 too before anybody thinks they can scapegoat me for that. Here, Chucklefish proves they're interested in repeating history and even making things worse. Too bad for them their flag looks like it got bleached by the topic closure. I would have liked to see them try to chuckle their way out of this.

Other Statistics