Plaintiff’s Sarcastic Fulfillment of Confusing Nonsensical Court Oder Docket #48 by Assigned Judge!
0[Audible Commentary Throughout Entire Video]
The assigned judge, JP Stadtmueller, issued a Court Order, Docket #48, for all parties to submit an Accounting Statement reflecting the actual amount in lost ad revenue I, the Pro se Plaintiff, in this legal matter, supposedly lost!
This is the assigned judge's attempt to allow the Defendants, Google, YouTube and Alphabet Incorporated to dictate how much in alleged ad revenue was stolen from me in order to give the Defendants ample power to have my lawsuit dismissed due to Improper Subject Matter Jurisdiction which the United States District Court currently has due to Diversity of Citizenship of all Parties and the Monetary Amount being sued for, which the assigned judge is purposely attempting to alter the amount being sued for with false claims that my lawsuit does not qualify for Punitive Damages despite the several legal sources I have cited that says otherwise due to the substantial amount of evidence I have submitted with my lawsuit and to the Defendants and Counsel for the Defendants.
There is no way I can put an actual amount on how much the Defendants stole from me in ad revenue while flagging, unflagging and reflagging my video content over the course of nearly 5 years, lying about the content of my video(s) to stop ad revenue and age restricting video content that were not in violation of Community Guidelines with emails sent to me to prove the Defendants action(s) and other evidence.
The Defendants, on the other hand can easily lie and state a miniscule amount in order to influence the judge's intent on dismissing my lawsuit by any means necessary, against the Defendants, even by staging an unwarranted Court Order in order to do so!
To date, the Defendants also continue to defame my character by alleging a video of mine having blood, violence, gore among other things stated by a human reviewer, which contained nothing of the sort and then falsely accusing me of allegedly stealing other YouTube video content from alleged YouTube video channels and uploading alleged content to my YouTube channel with absolutely no submitted proof.
The assigned judge continues to unwarrantedly attack the evidence I have submitted against the Defendants, despite my demand for a jury trial, yet hasn't shown any interest in the Defendants providing evidence to support their false claims!
[Video Time Stamps]
0:00 Cover Letter To Plaintiff's Accounting Statement (Theorizing Intent of Docket #48 Court Order)
1:45 Attachment 1 of 2 Proving Judge's Intent on Staging Improper Subject Matter Jurisdiction to Have My Lawsuit Dismissed
2:36 Cover Letter to Plaintiff's Accounting Statement (Theorizing Intent of Docket #48 Court Order) (continued)
3:16 Plaintiff's Accounting Statement (with Arguments)
4:02 Attachment 2 of 2 Proving Further Defamation of Character as to why My YouTube channel was Demonetized for Allegedly Stealing Other
YouTube Videos and Uploading Alleged Videos to My YouTube Channel (To Date, No Proof Submitted by Defendants)
4:33 Plaintiff's Accounting Statement (with Arguments) (continued)
5:55 Thanks for Watching, Listening and Reading! (Outgoing Message)
facebook.com/600913780566826/videos/789184565396571/