Plaintiff Subject Matter Jurisdiction Brief Filed 1 Day After Defendants Brief! I Don’t Mess Around!
2(THIS VIDEO CONTAINS AUDIO COMMENTARY THROUGOUT. YOU MAY NEED TO ADJUST YOUR VOLUME.)
I'm still extremely disgusted by the assigned judge JP Stadtmueller pointing out the Defendants failure consider Subject Matter Jurisdiction in his disgustingly and extremely biased one sided Court Order for submission of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Briefs! The judge was all over the place with this 8 page court order!
I filed an 8 page reply letter, tearing down and rebutting everything the judge had to say! I must of struck a NERVE because 5 out of the 8 page reply letter were scanned into digital record! Pages 2, 4 and 6 were not scanned until after it was discovered after logging into my Pacer Account!
Page 4 of my reply letter to the Docket #31Court Order contained a preview of how I intended to present my arguments for proper Subject Matter Jurisdiction! You can guess why it was NOT scanned into digital record!
NOW DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHY I HAD MY SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION BRIEF ALREADY PREPARED?! It was because the judge brought up the issue and NOT the Defendants which is why I presented my arguments based on local state and federal statutes! Judge JP Stadtmueller has to be the most disgusting judge I have ever encountered whether civil or criminal!
By the way, ENJOY THE VIDEO AND FEEL FREE TO LEAVE A COMMENT IF YOU LEARNED ANYTHING FROM THE VIDEO.
[Video Time Stamps]
0:00 Page 1 of 4 Getting Right to the Point Proving Subject Matter Jurisdiction
2:49 Page 2 of 4 Getting Right to the Point Proving Subject Matter Jurisdiction & Addressing More of Docket #31
7:04 Page 3 of 4 Getting Right to the Point Continuing to Address More of Docket #31 Regarding Punitive Damages and Plaintiff's Demand for a Jury Trial
11:23 Addressing Why the Plaintiff's Lawsuit was Filed Incorrectly. Theorizing Why the Defendants Cited Federal Statutes in Their Motion Briefing. Telling the Assigned Judge Why I Refuse to Address the Defendants Subject Matter Jurisdiction Brief
13:32 Proving the Assigned Judge Appearing to Assist The Defendants via Docket #31
14:28 Questioning if the Assigned Judge Will Allow the Defendants to File Motion After Motion via Docket #31
14:50 Issue #1 The Plaintiff has with Pages 7 and 8 of Docket #31 Court Order for Subject Matter Jurisdiction Briefs
15:06 Issue #2 The Plaintiff has with Pages 7 and 8 of Docket #31 Court Order for Subject Matter Jurisdiction Briefs
15:40 Issue #3 The Plaintiff has with Pages 7 and 8 of Docket #31 Court Order for Subject Matter Jurisdiction Briefs
16:08 Issue #4 The Plaintiff has with Pages 7 and 8 of Docket #31 Court Order for Subject Matter Jurisdiction Briefs
17:00 7 Attachments Included with Brief Reminding the Judge that the Plaintiff Demanded a Jury Trial and Filed Suit Under 28 USC 1332 and NOT 28 USC 1331
17:21 Thanks for Watching, Listening and Reading!