The Modern Day Bias Concerning 'Dragons...'๐๐
1Hello and thanks for watching, I wasn't planning on doing a video today, but as I was reading The Time Traveller's Guide To Medieval England, I noticed something that irked me.
I have known for a long time about the ridicule, or should I say the evolutionary bent used when the word 'dragon' shows up in history books.
Almost all historians see dragons (dinosaurs) as fictional creatures, after all.
Most historians and archaeologists have an evolutionary and secular worldview, which smacks of arrogance, as the word dinosaur replaced dragon in 1841 by Richard Owen.
And the world is full of dragon legends from every continent on earth, kind of makes you think...
And that's without looking into the proof that man and dinosaurs lived side by side.
Just one of the videos on YouTube which go into this topic, I apologise if they say the earth is only a few thousand years old.
But, they are right about the dinosaurs etc...
(I mention the legends/myths of gods in my vid, it's my belief that they were only too real, and were in fact the fallen angels.)
https://youtu.be/Ya7J8aYV9vU
It was only in 1677 when the first dinosaur bone was found, and at first was mistook for the bone of a large human.
So saying that the ancients and people from history found these fossils, and put them together, and created dragon stories inspired from them is ridiculous.
It takes scientific know how to put dinosaur fossils together too, that's if they could even find them all, as many are scattered over a wide area...
Unfortunately, this world is full bias and an ignorance that runs deep, and anyone such as myself who says anything against secular reasoning, gets dismissed.
*Sometimes, the truth of a matter is staring at us right in the face, but due to presuppositions and bias, we can't see it, Amen....*